AU
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp (AUB)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Adjusted operating EPS of $0.95 beat S&P Global consensus of ~$0.80, driven by a 38 bps NIM (FTE) expansion to 3.83% and accretion from the Sandy Spring acquisition; GAAP EPS of $0.12 was depressed by $78.9M merger costs and $100.9M Day 1 CECL expense . EPS consensus per S&P Global was 0.80 with 6 estimates; AUB delivered 0.95*.
- Core banking trends were solid: net interest income rose to $321.4M (+74% q/q), adjusted operating efficiency ratio improved to 48.34%, and net charge-offs were 1 bp annualized; deposit costs fell 9 bps q/q to 2.20% .
- Strategic actions largely de-risked the balance sheet: closing of Sandy Spring (Apr 1), sale of ~$2.0B CRE loans to Blackstone at “low 90s” of par (pre-tax gain $15.7M), and settlement of the equity forward for ~$385M in proceeds .
- FY2025 outlook mostly maintained but tightened: NII (FTE) ~$1.15–$1.20B (narrowed), NIM (FTE) ~3.75–4.00% (unchanged), ACL/loans ~120–130 bps (unchanged), NCO ~15–20 bps (narrowed), adj. noninterest income raised to ~$175–$185M, and adj. noninterest expense to ~$670–$680M; three 25 bps Fed cuts assumed starting September .
- Near-term catalysts: Sandy Spring core conversion in October (cost save run-rate), continued NIM grind higher (lower deposit costs, accretion), North Carolina expansion plan, and December Analyst Day; capital build supports potential 2026 buybacks per CFO commentary .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- NIM (FTE) expanded 38 bps to 3.83% on acquisition-related accretion and lower deposit costs; loan yield rose 47 bps to 6.48% with ~39 bps from accretion and 9 bps core improvement .
- Successful CRE de-risking and proceeds deployment: ~$2.0B CRE loans sold to Blackstone at low 90s, with $15.7M gain; proceeds support payoff of high-cost funding and securities reinvestment .
- Strong operating profitability on an adjusted basis: adjusted EPS $0.95, adjusted ROA 1.46%, adjusted ROTCE 23.79%, and adjusted operating efficiency ratio 48.34% .
- CEO quote: “Our operating results demonstrate that we are off to a great start with the [Sandy Spring] acquisition,” and “better-than-expected pricing” on the CRE sale .
-
What Went Wrong
- GAAP earnings were noisy: merger-related costs ($78.9M) and Day 1 CECL ($100.9M) depressed GAAP EPS to $0.12; effective tax rate was -13.2% due to an $8M DTA benefit .
- NPAs rose to 0.60% of loans (from 0.38% q/q) driven by acquired PCD loans; 90+ day accruing rose to 0.15% of loans (from 0.04% q/q) .
- Operating expenses surged to $279.7M on merger costs; even on an adjusted basis, noninterest expense increased with full-quarter Sandy Spring run-rate (salaries, technology, occupancy, FDIC premiums) .
Financial Results
P&L snapshot and margins (oldest → newest)
Q2 2025 vs Estimates (S&P Global definitions)
- Note: Company reports Total Revenue (FTE) of $407.3M and GAAP total revenue (NII + noninterest income) of $402.9M. S&P’s revenue taxonomy differs; use caution comparing to company totals . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key credit and balance sheet KPIs (oldest → newest)
Loan & deposit scale (period-end)
Loan mix (Q2 2025, period-end)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO John Asbury: “Our operating results demonstrate that we are off to a great start with the [Sandy Spring] acquisition… our team achieved better-than-expected pricing on the [~$2B] CRE loan sale” .
- CFO Rob Gorman: Adjusted operating EPS $0.95; adjusted ROTCE 23.8%; provision elevated by Day 1 CECL on non‑PCD loans and RUC; core NIM improved ~8 bps excluding accretion .
- Strategy and growth: “We now have the number one regional bank by depository market share in both Maryland and Virginia… Chapter three focuses on organic expansion in North Carolina” .
Q&A Highlights
- NIM outlook: Core NIM should continue to “grind higher,” aided by deposit repricing; CD book rolling from ~4.40% into ~3.75–4.00% with some offset from variable loan resets .
- Capital and buybacks: CET1 at 9.8%, expected to accrete 25–30 bps per quarter; potential share repurchases to be evaluated as CET1 approaches 10.5–11% (likely 1H 2026) .
- Accretion income: ~$45M accretion this quarter viewed as a reasonable run rate, but inherently volatile .
- Loan growth: Pro forma Q2 annualized ~4% core growth; pipelines at record levels (ex‑Sandy) and improving sentiment; CRE focus shifting to stabilized properties .
- Liquidity deployment: ~$1.6B cash at quarter-end to pay down brokered CDs ($200–300M+ in Q3), add ~$500M to securities, and support loan growth; comfortable L/D range 90–95% vs 88% current .
Estimates Context
- Primary (adjusted) EPS: AUB delivered $0.95 vs ~$0.80 consensus (6 estimates), a ~19% beat, reflecting stronger NIM expansion and accretion than modeled*.
- Revenue: S&P revenue actual and consensus figures differ from company’s “Total revenue (FTE)”; treat revenue “miss” cautiously given tax-equivalent and non-GAAP versus S&P taxonomy*.
- Forward quarters: Q3’25 EPS consensus at ~$0.84 (9 estimates); Q4’25 at ~$0.86 (9 estimates). Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Core earnings power is stronger than GAAP EPS indicates; adjusted metrics (EPS $0.95, ROTCE ~24%) highlight accretive Sandy Spring economics and positive operating leverage .
- Margin tailwinds remain: lower deposit costs, fixed-rate loan repricing, and accretion support NIM; management still targets full-year NIM (FTE) ~3.75–4.00% despite later-dated cut assumptions .
- Balance sheet de-risked: ~$2B CRE sale executed at better-than-expected pricing; NPAs higher due to acquired PCD loans but credit costs guided to a benign 15–20 bps for 2025 .
- Cost synergy realization should step up post-October conversion; adj. efficiency ratio already improved to 48.34% Q2 .
- Capital build supports optionality in 2026 (dividends and buybacks) while funding North Carolina expansion (10 planned branches) and tech/AI investments .
- Watch items: integration execution, accretion volatility, and regional macro (tariffs/government workforce); however, GovCon and office exposures appear manageable with favorable defense spending backdrop .
- Near-term catalysts: October systems conversion, deposit cost decline cadence, and December Analyst Day updates on the 3-year strategic plan .
Notes: Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Citations:
- Earnings release and 8‑K data:
- Q2’25 call transcript:
- Q1’25 release and call:
- CRE sale press release: